What is wallet relationship analysis?

Wallet relationship analysis looks for observable on-chain evidence connecting two or more addresses. Examples can include direct transfers, recurring transaction context, shared funding patterns or other network-specific interactions.

The important part is not merely detecting a connection; it is describing exactly what kind of connection was observed.

A relationship is not the same as common ownership

Two wallets can interact for many reasons: trading, payments, liquidity operations, contract execution, exchange withdrawals, treasury operations or simple transfers between unrelated parties. A direct edge in a graph therefore does not prove common control.

AYZO's core evidence rule: observed interaction can support “these wallets interacted.” It cannot by itself support “these wallets have the same owner.”

Relationship signals worth separating

SignalWhat it can showWhat it does not prove
Direct transferValue moved between two addressesCommon ownership or intent
Transaction co-occurrenceAddresses appeared in related transaction contextThat they are the same entity
Shared funding sourceAddresses received funds from a common sourceThat the source controls them
Recurring patternA repeated observable relationshipMalicious coordination

Why evidence graphs are useful

A graph can make a complex set of relationships easier to inspect, but the visual itself must not imply more certainty than the underlying evidence. Edge types, confidence and coverage are therefore more important than drawing many lines.

Who, how and why this page exists

WhoPublished and maintained by the AYZO product team.
HowWritten around AYZO Alpha's current observable evidence model and explicit coverage limits.
WhyTo help users understand on-chain evidence before they use the live investigation product.