Why analyze Base separately?
Base is EVM-compatible, but users often research Base-native tokens, contracts and wallet activity as a distinct ecosystem. A dedicated landing page helps users start with the correct network context instead of assuming an Ethereum address automatically represents the same deployment on Base.
Base token investigation workflow
Confirm the network and contract
Start with the exact Base contract address. The same-looking token name can exist on multiple networks, and contract addresses must be interpreted in the selected chain context.
Review available holder intelligence
When reliable holder coverage is available, concentration can help identify which accounts deserve more attention. AYZO does not convert concentration alone into a fraud or safety claim.
Inspect wallet relationships and funding
On-chain interactions and funding patterns can reveal useful investigation paths. AYZO keeps evidence semantics conservative: interaction is evidence of activity, not automatic identity attribution.
Add contract/developer context where available
On supported EVM flows, contract and deployment history can add context beyond balances. This is particularly useful when a token is new and its wallet graph is still developing.
Coverage is part of the result
If a provider cannot establish a sufficiently reliable holder or historical data set, AYZO can return limited or partial coverage. That is intentionally more useful than presenting an apparently complete result built from incomplete data.