SolSniffer is score-driven; AYZO is evidence-driven
SolSniffer describes its product as a Solana token security scanner using 20+ security indicators and a proprietary Snifscore. Its API also exposes liquidity, token data, top-holder distribution and deployer information. AYZO takes a different approach: it is designed to keep the evidence layers visible rather than compressing the investigation into one score.
| Capability | SolSniffer | AYZO |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Solana token security scanning | Multichain token and wallet investigation |
| Scoring | Proprietary Snifscore | No single safe/scam score; evidence and coverage are shown separately |
| Security indicators | 20+ indicators according to SolSniffer | Network-specific evidence layers rather than a fixed indicator count |
| Holder data | Top-holder distribution is available in its API product | Holder concentration and owner-level context when coverage supports it |
| Deployer information | Included in SolSniffer's detailed audit/API data | Developer/deployer intelligence is part of the deeper Pro/Advanced direction |
| Wallet relationships & funding | Not the central positioning of the referenced scanner/API page | Core AYZO investigation layers |
| Network scope | Solana-focused | 22 networks including Solana, Bitcoin, Dogecoin, TRON, XRP Ledger, Litecoin, Sui, TON, Stellar, Hyperliquid and 12 EVM networks |
You want a dedicated Solana security score.
Its scanner and API are built around fast Solana token security indicators and Snifscore-based triage.
You prefer inspectable evidence over a single score.
AYZO is built for following wallet, funding and relationship evidence while preserving uncertainty and coverage limits.
Why the distinction matters
A score is useful for triage because it compresses many signals into a fast answer. An evidence-first workflow is useful when a user wants to inspect why the result exists and which parts of the underlying data are incomplete. These are different product philosophies, and some researchers may use both.
Which workflow fits your question?
Choose SolSniffer when your primary task is a Solana token-security scan built around Snifscore and security indicators. SolSniffer's official API documentation describes more than 20 security indicators, a proprietary scoring algorithm, liquidity information, holder distribution and deployer information.
Choose AYZO when your question extends into inspectable wallet relationships, funding provenance, holder concentration and evidence coverage, and you want those observations kept separate from conclusions the chain cannot prove.
Product reference: SolSniffer official API service. Product features can change; verify current capabilities with the provider.
Try the workflow yourself
Use AYZO Hub with a token, wallet, contract or supported address and inspect the evidence available for that network. The Free plan currently includes 3 analyses every 24 hours.